So my understanding is recovery orders are for a primary carer's whose kids have not been returned by the non-primary carer, or at least if for example the primary carer relocated without consent hence depriving the other parent access, so not applicable.
So has she told you that you won't be seeing the kid next holidays? Regardless there is nothing you can do until she doesn't comply with the orders.
You said something about not knowing who is 'helping her'. Look the reason she is winning is because she has no idea about the rules, etc. She is making the rules up at the minute and until a higher authority starts threatening her with jail, etc, or losing primary care status. She is gonna all of a sudden realise that she ain't making the rules up anymore. But at present, she has had nearly 2 years of pulling the strings and I hate to say it but by not applying force against her, she has an inflated sense of her ability to make up the rules.
I really hope you see the kid next holidays and probably, more importantly, don't get caught up in crazy s**t...
So claims of DV from way back when.. Not relevant. Claims child's behaviour has deteriorated because of talking to dad on the phone - stupid. Claims child's behaviour at school is because of dad - stupid.
If this goes to court she is going to be seen as alienating the dad. She has been successful so far, but if she breaches court orders, it won't go well. So for the minute, go ahead as planned to see the kid in the holidays and continue organising face-time conversations and recording when it doesn't happen. It is one thing to stop the kid seeing dad. It is another thing to start poisoning the kid's mind about dad. Courts don't like that either.
So has she told you that you won't be seeing the kid next holidays? Regardless there is nothing you can do until she doesn't comply with the orders.
You said something about not knowing who is 'helping her'. Look the reason she is winning is because she has no idea about the rules, etc. She is making the rules up at the minute and until a higher authority starts threatening her with jail, etc, or losing primary care status. She is gonna all of a sudden realise that she ain't making the rules up anymore. But at present, she has had nearly 2 years of pulling the strings and I hate to say it but by not applying force against her, she has an inflated sense of her ability to make up the rules.
I really hope you see the kid next holidays and probably, more importantly, don't get caught up in crazy s**t...
So claims of DV from way back when.. Not relevant. Claims child's behaviour has deteriorated because of talking to dad on the phone - stupid. Claims child's behaviour at school is because of dad - stupid.
If this goes to court she is going to be seen as alienating the dad. She has been successful so far, but if she breaches court orders, it won't go well. So for the minute, go ahead as planned to see the kid in the holidays and continue organising face-time conversations and recording when it doesn't happen. It is one thing to stop the kid seeing dad. It is another thing to start poisoning the kid's mind about dad. Courts don't like that either.