Hello appreciate the response,
Judge wasn’t prepared to find matter of fact on the interim and it would have only delayed final hearing.
Forensic psychologist recommends change of residence, highlights the dangers of his mum and grandmother.
Police, after myself being attacked in my own home I had 2 restraining orders placed on me.
I witnessed one of them inflict injury on themselves.
Mothers medical records involuntary admitted to mental hospital approx 10 times, 3 times in last year, one just prior to attack on myself.
Mother has multiple assault convictions, myself nothing.
Child services has substantiated abuse by mother and grandmother...
And I have to peacefully and calmly wait on the sidelines.
Why would interim hearings postpone final date? Its already booked in and in the event the others booked on the same day aren't settled before final hearing its highly likely yours would take precedent and be heard.i reckon the judge just didn't want to hear it. But thats BS. Your kid is at risk. This shot riles me up.
I had 6 interim hearings in 12 months with multiple having custody change requests. And there was zero reason for those requests. You have loads of reasons. Imo the judge is being lazy. Was the forensic psychologist ordered by the court? Do not spend a other dollar on lawyers until final hearing. I represented my self in half of the interim hearings and regret not representing my self the whole time in the interim.
Mate, I'd write to the registra and ask for a hearing. Say you have serious concerns about the safety of your child and have supporting documents saying the status quo could cause irreparable damage to the child. Get really good attachments (letters to your affidavit). I'm not expert but went through a bit (like 14 court hearing for family and ivo in 18 months). I learnt a lot. The attachments I'd get would be:
1) psych report saying kid in danger and change of custody recommended. Hopefully the psychologist mentioned the urgency.
2) Dr report of the mum's instability
3) police report suggesting accusations are false and there are no charges pending.
4) may be a letter/evidence from police discussing past history.
5) if the psych didn't put urgency to the change of custody. I would ask that psych, in an email, "I am greatly concerned for the emotional well-being of my child and the negative developmental consequences of the child continuing in the mother's custody. Could the child be at long term behavioural, emotional and developmental risk remaining in the full custody of the mother and maternal grandmother for another 6 months". You want to convince the judge that he is risking the future of the child as the age of the child developme tally is so important.
You really have nothing to lose. Represent yourself and it'll cost you nothing.
I am not a lawyer, and this would probably be a very bad move, but I reckon you should be able to take the child and not return it on the justification there is a risk to the child. When the contravention of orders is lodged by the mum, you then bring up all the evidence. If judge gets oissed off you took it into your hands to determine the risk, say, well, it would have been great for the law to have protected my child but that wasn't happening and I took the recommendation of the forensic psychologist to protect the behavioural development of my child at this highly important age.