I would like to express my point of view and I am open for discussion.
I too was falsely accused and she got an interim order without me being able to say a word. I understand exactly what OP is saying but I am not convinced that consent without admission is the right approach. My concern on Consent without Admission is she and/or her lawyer in family court would say: “why did you consent to this order if you didn’t do it?”
And once the DVO order is in place you are branded as a perpetrator for life and if I’m correct, family court is bound to put this formal order into final consideration no matter how you got it. She’d use that to her advantage.
When I first got here I too was advised by many to consent. But it never felt right to me. I fully support focusing on family court result but I also saw fighting DVO/IVO/AVO as being important. So I contested the IVO in full, stood firm in my position and told her police lawyer that I will apply for cost order should we go to trial. I then gathered enough evidence to disprove her lies.
In the end, police withdrew the IVO application at the directional hearing, I didn’t even get a chance to show them my evidence. I still spent 7k on legal cost and never got this money back. But I am clean on record. Next, I put what she did and this police withdrawal into my family court affidavit. We are still in the family court proceeding and waiting to go to the trail next year. But as time goes, all her craziness has surfaced themselves and it has become a stereotypical BPD/NPD toxic behaviour that court and family report consultant should be able to see through easily, and I have collected enough evidence to show a pattern of her behaviour that is not in the best interest of the child.
I too was falsely accused and she got an interim order without me being able to say a word. I understand exactly what OP is saying but I am not convinced that consent without admission is the right approach. My concern on Consent without Admission is she and/or her lawyer in family court would say: “why did you consent to this order if you didn’t do it?”
And once the DVO order is in place you are branded as a perpetrator for life and if I’m correct, family court is bound to put this formal order into final consideration no matter how you got it. She’d use that to her advantage.
When I first got here I too was advised by many to consent. But it never felt right to me. I fully support focusing on family court result but I also saw fighting DVO/IVO/AVO as being important. So I contested the IVO in full, stood firm in my position and told her police lawyer that I will apply for cost order should we go to trial. I then gathered enough evidence to disprove her lies.
In the end, police withdrew the IVO application at the directional hearing, I didn’t even get a chance to show them my evidence. I still spent 7k on legal cost and never got this money back. But I am clean on record. Next, I put what she did and this police withdrawal into my family court affidavit. We are still in the family court proceeding and waiting to go to the trail next year. But as time goes, all her craziness has surfaced themselves and it has become a stereotypical BPD/NPD toxic behaviour that court and family report consultant should be able to see through easily, and I have collected enough evidence to show a pattern of her behaviour that is not in the best interest of the child.