By chance I got to see a duty children's lawyer morning of court. She clued me up on a lot, and gave me a good serve for feeling sorry for myself, said its nothing to do with me, or her in this court, its all about the kids. She had a quick flick thru dvo and recovery papers, mentioned the fact magistrates are aware of all the games played, and offered to try make a deal with Mrs lawyer, saying if she does, and gives me any unsupervised access at all before the trial, after accusing me of 124 various offences against her and the kids, 3 weeks after separation.
He will know its a load of s**t, go easy on me, and give me a chance to respond and will take what I say on board as well, unlike dv court, where nothing I say means jack s**t, she''s a victim and I'm not worth the risk by believing me, or the conclusive evidence that its all bs, because she lied her ass off, but is still saying scared of me. full stop case closed, and do I accept the dvo or want to get told the same thing after the trial?
Logic, and everyone and everything suggests guilty without omission is the path of least resistance, but a few over riding factors prevent me taking that path, like my childhood listening to my mum getting bounced off walls and no help available, even if was she was too scared to report it, a piece of paper wouldn't stop it, it would create it more.
And my mum is now a dv worker in the courts, and helps women thru the process, including refuge help if need be, and every day she is unable to find spots within refuges as they are full to the brim, of real victims, the fact mrs went last time for weeks on end, running from a cornetto (no dvo in place when offered) is making a mockery of dv and all the people who suffer from it, it also is a joke on the legal system there to protect real victims, and also a pretty big ""f"" you, to me, and my mum, as Mrs well knows and seems to be enjoying.
So I feel kind of obliged to at least let magistrate know he is supporting that to happen, if he cares or not, if it helps or and plus I wouldn't mind being able to go to my house and get tools and stuff that helps with day to day life, as usually given when your address is not lied about on application.
She reported every txt as a breach, police issued none, all were about kids, as hadn't heard or seen them for 5 week (first dvo may 2016). She withdrew it herself and came home, promising was not her idea, was her mums, was never scared or afraid, and felt s**t about being in refuge etc. Also promising never could or would she do it again. 10 months later here we are, hard to handle or accept, or just casually plead guilty to save the inevitable hassle for no end result worth going thru it, just stubborn pride and worthy a try.
I think that about covers that part.
He will know its a load of s**t, go easy on me, and give me a chance to respond and will take what I say on board as well, unlike dv court, where nothing I say means jack s**t, she''s a victim and I'm not worth the risk by believing me, or the conclusive evidence that its all bs, because she lied her ass off, but is still saying scared of me. full stop case closed, and do I accept the dvo or want to get told the same thing after the trial?
Logic, and everyone and everything suggests guilty without omission is the path of least resistance, but a few over riding factors prevent me taking that path, like my childhood listening to my mum getting bounced off walls and no help available, even if was she was too scared to report it, a piece of paper wouldn't stop it, it would create it more.
And my mum is now a dv worker in the courts, and helps women thru the process, including refuge help if need be, and every day she is unable to find spots within refuges as they are full to the brim, of real victims, the fact mrs went last time for weeks on end, running from a cornetto (no dvo in place when offered) is making a mockery of dv and all the people who suffer from it, it also is a joke on the legal system there to protect real victims, and also a pretty big ""f"" you, to me, and my mum, as Mrs well knows and seems to be enjoying.
So I feel kind of obliged to at least let magistrate know he is supporting that to happen, if he cares or not, if it helps or and plus I wouldn't mind being able to go to my house and get tools and stuff that helps with day to day life, as usually given when your address is not lied about on application.
She reported every txt as a breach, police issued none, all were about kids, as hadn't heard or seen them for 5 week (first dvo may 2016). She withdrew it herself and came home, promising was not her idea, was her mums, was never scared or afraid, and felt s**t about being in refuge etc. Also promising never could or would she do it again. 10 months later here we are, hard to handle or accept, or just casually plead guilty to save the inevitable hassle for no end result worth going thru it, just stubborn pride and worthy a try.
I think that about covers that part.