You're missing the point mate, for conduct to constitute a criminal offence it must be proved with respect to both the mental and physical elements, and that only occurs in the criminal jurisdiction.
You cannot, in the civil jurisdiction (subject to an outright admission of guilt by the respondent in such proceedings) prove an "actionable" criminal offence, you can only prove your case on the facts and raise questions which the DPP might be interested in pursuing.
But you don't need a Tribunal Member, Magistrate or Judge for that, you can simply walk into a cop shop and make a complaint. Alternatively, you can alert the ACCC (or ASIC as the case may be) with your experience. If you have won your civil case, and if there has been impropriety of a criminal nature, I expect that they will be very interested in what you have to say.
But first things first, win your case, it should be easy if it is criminal and you have the evidence.
Judges have been known to refer cases to the DPP, however it is most often related to contempt.
You cannot, in the civil jurisdiction (subject to an outright admission of guilt by the respondent in such proceedings) prove an "actionable" criminal offence, you can only prove your case on the facts and raise questions which the DPP might be interested in pursuing.
But you don't need a Tribunal Member, Magistrate or Judge for that, you can simply walk into a cop shop and make a complaint. Alternatively, you can alert the ACCC (or ASIC as the case may be) with your experience. If you have won your civil case, and if there has been impropriety of a criminal nature, I expect that they will be very interested in what you have to say.
But first things first, win your case, it should be easy if it is criminal and you have the evidence.
Judges have been known to refer cases to the DPP, however it is most often related to contempt.