Freedom of Speech v. An Intervention Order

[Rob Legat - SBPL]

Let’s take it back to simple terms, because you’re over complicating the argument to (apparently) justify your argument.

The courts are the arbiters of guilt. In most instances (including this one) the law holds that a person is innocent until proven guilty. Being legitimately labelled a murderer is reliant on a finding of guilt being made by a court of competent jurisdiction. Where no such finding has been made, because of the presumption of innocence, a person cannot be labelled a murderer.

 

[James95]

Just change from murderer to killer, simple.

I'm willing to do that.

 

[Tim W]

I'm willing to do that.

In which case, do not expect that to inspire the PINOP to change their mind.
And if he's (ever been ) a client of MHRT (NSW), then you don't even get to say that.

 

[DO_UNTO_OTHERS]

And if he's (ever been ) a client of MHRT (NSW), then you don't even get to say that.

Could you please elaborate on that? Are you saying it’s unlawful to publicly discuss somebody’s history with MHRT?

 

[Tim W]

Are you saying it’s unlawful to publicly discuss somebody’s history with MHRT?

In NSW, for the general public,
almost always, yes.