Would love representation but, unfortunately, cannot afford it. No, I haven't filed a listing advice, didn't realise I could.
I'll try. I found a case Smith v R in the HCA regarding identification from a video. Since the police facts and statements are purely based on the officers viewing the video and refer to the person in the video as me, doesn't that make them inadmissible ? Also the security officer they have called is testifying somebody from IT told him the video was destroyed, is that admissible hearsay?