Interesting thing happened today. A female friend who is separating from her husband was asked by her lawyer (could say pushed) to state that the soon to be husband had, in the past, been physically abusive towards her. Lawyer wanted to get a VRO in place asap. This man was never violent in anyway and has no police record against him. They also have 3 year old boy.
My question is how could any man in such a case defend against these false accusations and retain at least 50:50 custody? How does the court distinguish between last minute VROs and the truth?
My question is how could any man in such a case defend against these false accusations and retain at least 50:50 custody? How does the court distinguish between last minute VROs and the truth?