Remeber it is not a fine but a cost! It is not right that we did not have immediate access to our vehicles. This is because if we did they would have no grounds to stop us from leaving their premises. So by denying us access to our property they could then bully us into paying the $660.00. This sounds illegal to me..
Firstly: I didn't get towed by cactus, mine was a different company so there must be a few operating that all sound as dodgy as each other.
Secondly: Doing some research into it this is what I found. Body corperates are allowed to introduce and enforce by-laws in order to regulate common areas such as parking. If a third party parks on common ground (third party meaning a person who has no involvement or participation in the business or residence the parking is for) they are allowed to employ a contracted company to remove the vehicle as long as there is a sign postage adequately displayed warning to do so. However! And this is the thing I didn't realise until after I paid to get my car back, they have no legal power to enforce 'fines' on you for breaching this.
The towing 'cost' is due to the cost involved to the contractor to remove the vehicle (which is definitely not $660) but legally they are only allowed to move the car to an area that is able to be easily reached by the occupier to retrieve. By imposing a 'fine' that you must pay before releasing the car is actually a breach of the contract and illegal. If the cost of towing is not invoiced and paid in the future it is the contractors responsibility to undergo the process of employing a debt collector to then seek and rectify the balance.
So they are violating the towing regulations for the maximum charge for tows less than 50km and are legally in breach of body corporate by-laws that give them the right to tow in the first place by not releasing your car until you pay the money.
I personally think this is the dodgiest thing going around and is completely unethical and ripping people off and should be stopped.