Hey all,
I am the applicant in a child access case in the Federal Circuit Court of NSW.
I am currently seeing my baby son under supervised visits due to concerns about my alcohol and marijuana use.
I am a primary school teacher who continues to work unsupervised with young children as their classroom teacher with the NSW DEC.
I have stopped drinking excessively and have done CDT tests to show I'm no longer drinking to excess.
I have stopped using marijuana and have completed urine drug screen tests to show my levels are dropping and should be clean by next court hearing.
I now fear that the judge will say that we should continue supervised visits due to the AVO that 'protects' my ex-partner from me or the false child abuse allegations she has told family consultant about.
I already have subpoenaed police and FACS to get their records that show this abuse was unsubstantiated and that the mother made conflicting statements and still allowed me to spend unsupervised time with the child I supposedly abused. The mother has now told the family consultant that she fears I abused her daughter and this is why she doesn't want me around her daughter and the family consultant has now recommended that supervised visits continue until the safety risks surrounding myself have been further investigated.
The mother states in her AVDO statement that I was never physically violent but she would get scared when we argued. I accepted this ADVO without admissions.
I'm hoping the judge will see right through her lies about child abuse.
I fear the AVO may mean I continue to be deemed a risk and need to continue to be supervised with my son after our upcoming hearing (2nd hearing)
I can't understand how the NSW state government run Dept. of ED. can assess me as being safe to work with 25 children, unsupervised, that I am not related to but then the F.C.C is asking that I be supervised when I am with my own son. I have already offered to have my mother supervise if the mother claims I'm a risk. The mother says her main fear is me being a risk due to my alcohol use followed by marijuana use.
Does anybody know of men who have ADVO's against them that are still allowed to see their children unsupervised? (children are not included on the ADVO)
Thank you
I am the applicant in a child access case in the Federal Circuit Court of NSW.
I am currently seeing my baby son under supervised visits due to concerns about my alcohol and marijuana use.
I am a primary school teacher who continues to work unsupervised with young children as their classroom teacher with the NSW DEC.
I have stopped drinking excessively and have done CDT tests to show I'm no longer drinking to excess.
I have stopped using marijuana and have completed urine drug screen tests to show my levels are dropping and should be clean by next court hearing.
I now fear that the judge will say that we should continue supervised visits due to the AVO that 'protects' my ex-partner from me or the false child abuse allegations she has told family consultant about.
I already have subpoenaed police and FACS to get their records that show this abuse was unsubstantiated and that the mother made conflicting statements and still allowed me to spend unsupervised time with the child I supposedly abused. The mother has now told the family consultant that she fears I abused her daughter and this is why she doesn't want me around her daughter and the family consultant has now recommended that supervised visits continue until the safety risks surrounding myself have been further investigated.
The mother states in her AVDO statement that I was never physically violent but she would get scared when we argued. I accepted this ADVO without admissions.
I'm hoping the judge will see right through her lies about child abuse.
I fear the AVO may mean I continue to be deemed a risk and need to continue to be supervised with my son after our upcoming hearing (2nd hearing)
I can't understand how the NSW state government run Dept. of ED. can assess me as being safe to work with 25 children, unsupervised, that I am not related to but then the F.C.C is asking that I be supervised when I am with my own son. I have already offered to have my mother supervise if the mother claims I'm a risk. The mother says her main fear is me being a risk due to my alcohol use followed by marijuana use.
Does anybody know of men who have ADVO's against them that are still allowed to see their children unsupervised? (children are not included on the ADVO)
Thank you