Hi everyone, I am now in a family court process.
The background is as followed:
My ex applied IVO against me, both her and my son (3 soon turning 4) are in there after separation. I chose to consent without admission after reading many posts from this forum. My ex still allowed me to see my son about 3 times a week while she was around before mediation.
We went to mediation for two times but failed to come in agreement. I asked for 5 overnights per fortnight, she insisted only 2 per fortnight. During the mediation, I had 4 overnights within the half month period.
After two times mediation without coming to an agreement of parenting plan, my ex suddenly stopped all contact of me and my son at a supposed change over the location with an allegation of me verbally assaulting her. I later went to the police to get them to investigate and disapprove her allegation, with a polite letter saying I did not breach IVO.
Since my ex did not allow me to see my son, I had to apply application in federal circuit court. She is using legal aid lawyer. She later responded with an affidavit alleging me and grandparents being violent towards her and my son. Lots of lies and terrible allegation were there. We went to 1st court date, my solicitor tried to tell the judge I had been having regular time with my son and this should continue. But judge ordered supervised time instead because her allegation was very terrible. And the matter was transferred to family court.
I have been going to supervised time with my son every week for only 2 hours. I treasure every second being with him in the limited time. After months, I went back to direction hearing in family court. My supervisor gave me a very good family report based on her observation. However my lawyer did not file any affidavit before going back to the court. But my ex filed another affidavit of sexual abuse during the marriage only 2 days before court date. Registrar stood down the court and asked us to come up with some agreement.
My lawyer tried to ask for unsupervised time, but the other side insisted supervised to be continued. In the end, both parties agreed on only a few more to be continued and reportable, then both parties will have to negotiate again before going back to the next direction hearing. My lawyer also asked for ICL to be involved.
My questions are:
Is it a normal procedure outcome? Supervised time, more supervised time, aiming for an unsupervised time, hoping for some overnights. I feel like I am not making progress and frustrated knowing the fact that more supervised time to come. If both parties did not come in agreement during stood down, will registrar make any decision?
Can anyone please give me some suggestion? I only want to get more time with my son, and co-parent with my ex. Am I in the right approach?
I appreciate any help and thank you in advance!
The background is as followed:
My ex applied IVO against me, both her and my son (3 soon turning 4) are in there after separation. I chose to consent without admission after reading many posts from this forum. My ex still allowed me to see my son about 3 times a week while she was around before mediation.
We went to mediation for two times but failed to come in agreement. I asked for 5 overnights per fortnight, she insisted only 2 per fortnight. During the mediation, I had 4 overnights within the half month period.
After two times mediation without coming to an agreement of parenting plan, my ex suddenly stopped all contact of me and my son at a supposed change over the location with an allegation of me verbally assaulting her. I later went to the police to get them to investigate and disapprove her allegation, with a polite letter saying I did not breach IVO.
Since my ex did not allow me to see my son, I had to apply application in federal circuit court. She is using legal aid lawyer. She later responded with an affidavit alleging me and grandparents being violent towards her and my son. Lots of lies and terrible allegation were there. We went to 1st court date, my solicitor tried to tell the judge I had been having regular time with my son and this should continue. But judge ordered supervised time instead because her allegation was very terrible. And the matter was transferred to family court.
I have been going to supervised time with my son every week for only 2 hours. I treasure every second being with him in the limited time. After months, I went back to direction hearing in family court. My supervisor gave me a very good family report based on her observation. However my lawyer did not file any affidavit before going back to the court. But my ex filed another affidavit of sexual abuse during the marriage only 2 days before court date. Registrar stood down the court and asked us to come up with some agreement.
My lawyer tried to ask for unsupervised time, but the other side insisted supervised to be continued. In the end, both parties agreed on only a few more to be continued and reportable, then both parties will have to negotiate again before going back to the next direction hearing. My lawyer also asked for ICL to be involved.
My questions are:
Is it a normal procedure outcome? Supervised time, more supervised time, aiming for an unsupervised time, hoping for some overnights. I feel like I am not making progress and frustrated knowing the fact that more supervised time to come. If both parties did not come in agreement during stood down, will registrar make any decision?
Can anyone please give me some suggestion? I only want to get more time with my son, and co-parent with my ex. Am I in the right approach?
I appreciate any help and thank you in advance!