My neighbour has requested a fence, which we clearly need. The top wall is his and the bottom wall is mine. The white peg is the boundary between our blocks. He wants to put a colorbond fence up and originally I asked if it could go on top of his wall but he has refused saying his wall is 30mm inside the boundary. He wants the bottom of the panels to start at the top of his wall and go up from there with the posts to go to ground level where the peg is, which is 1metre. I don’t want to see this from my side of the fence and I would like to see the fence panels began at the ground height, to effectively hide his wall from my side, and given that’s were the boundary ground level is then that’s should be the starting point for the fence. . He refused.
I am of the opinion that the fence panel should begin on ground level and go up as this is where the boundary lies, and given he has chosen to retain his block up 1m (to allow him to build two units on it) the extra cost associated with having the fence reach his desired height above the standard 1.5 high fence should be his cost to bare alone.
He believes that I should be the one to pay the extra because I want it to go down below his finished wall height. Has anyone seen this previously or has advice for me. The NSW SEPP 2008 Refers to the fence height from ground level (existing) which I would deem to the the level of dirt between our two walls where the white peg is.
He also states that by doing it my way it would not comply as the fence height would then be 2.5m high and above the 2.1m from what is allowed. I have argued with him saying that the way he wants thefence is going to be exactly the same finished height also(1.5m above his wall or 2.5m from the ground level at the boundary line) but he fails to comprehend this.
Any help or advice form me????
We are in the process of mediation and we will see what happens there.
Thanks for your time
Clint.
I am of the opinion that the fence panel should begin on ground level and go up as this is where the boundary lies, and given he has chosen to retain his block up 1m (to allow him to build two units on it) the extra cost associated with having the fence reach his desired height above the standard 1.5 high fence should be his cost to bare alone.
He believes that I should be the one to pay the extra because I want it to go down below his finished wall height. Has anyone seen this previously or has advice for me. The NSW SEPP 2008 Refers to the fence height from ground level (existing) which I would deem to the the level of dirt between our two walls where the white peg is.
He also states that by doing it my way it would not comply as the fence height would then be 2.5m high and above the 2.1m from what is allowed. I have argued with him saying that the way he wants thefence is going to be exactly the same finished height also(1.5m above his wall or 2.5m from the ground level at the boundary line) but he fails to comprehend this.
Any help or advice form me????
We are in the process of mediation and we will see what happens there.
Thanks for your time
Clint.