NSW Section 557 of the Fairwork Act

Australia's #1 for Law
Join 150,000 Australians every month. Ask a question, respond to a question and better understand the law today!
FREE - Join Now

Taco Cat

Well-Known Member
30 April 2018
55
1
199
Section 557 deals with contraventions being considered as part of a single course of conduct. Section (1) describes the circumstances that this applies. Section (2) lists the civil remedy provisions to which it applies. The final entry in (2) is:
(s) any other civil remedy provisions prescribed by the regulations.

In Collison v Brighton Road Enterprises Pty Ltd T/A The Grosvenor Hotel & Anor (No.2) (2016) FCCA 1798, Judge Jones states twice that


  1. Section 557(1) of the Act provides that:
    • Course of conduct
    • (1) For the purposes of this Part, 2 or more contraventions of a civil remedy provision referred to in subsection (2) are, subject to subsection (3), taken to constitute a single contravention if:
      • (a) the contraventions are committed by the same person; and
      • (b) the contraventions arose out of a course of conduct by the person.
  2. These provisions do not, however, apply to contraventions of the general protection provisions of the Act: sub-s.557(2) of the Act.



Breaches of the general protections are clearly civil remedy provisions and there is no reason to assume they are not covered by (2) (s), so why does Judge Jones state the section does not apply? No precedent is given.
 

Rod

Lawyer
LawConnect (LawTap) Verified
27 May 2014
7,820
1,072
2,894
www.hutchinsonlegal.com.au
Beaches of the general protections are clearly civil remedy provisions and there is no reason to assume they are not covered by (2) (s),

Are you confusing the Fair Work Regulations with the Fair Work Act?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taco Cat

Taco Cat

Well-Known Member
30 April 2018
55
1
199

FAIR WORK ACT 2009 (NO. 28, 2009) - SECT 557​

Course of conduct
(1) For the purposes of this Part, 2 or more contraventions of a civil remedy provision referred to in subsection (2) are, subject to subsection (3), taken to constitute a single contravention if:

(a) the contraventions are committed by the same person; and

(b) the contraventions arose out of a course of conduct by the person.

(2) The civil remedy provisions are the following:

(a) subsection 44(1) (which deals with contraventions of the National Employment Standards);

(b) section 45 (which deals with contraventions of modern awards);

(c) section 50 (which deals with contraventions of enterprise agreements);

(d) section 280 (which deals with contraventions of workplace determinations);

(e) section 293 (which deals with contraventions of national minimum wage orders);

(f) section 305 (which deals with contraventions of equal remuneration orders);

(g) subsection 323(1) (which deals with methods and frequency of payment);

(h) subsection 323(3) (which deals with methods of payment specified in modern awardsor enterprise agreements);

(i) subsection 325(1) (which deals with unreasonable requirements to spend amounts);

(j) subsection 417(1) (which deals with industrial action before the nominal expiry date of an enterprise agreement etc.);

(k) subsection 421(1) (which deals with contraventions of orders in relation to industrial action);

(l) section 434 (which deals with contraventions of Ministerial directions in relation to industrial action);

(m) subsection 530(4) (which deals with notifying Centrelink of certain proposed dismissals);

(n) subsections 535(1) and (2) (which deal with employer obligations in relation to employee records);

(o) subsections 536(1) and (2) (which deal with employer obligations in relation to pay slips);

(p) subsection 745(1) (which deals with contraventions of the extended parental leave provisions);

(q) section 760 (which deals with contraventions of the extended notice of termination provisions);

(r) subsection 785(4) (which deals with notifying Centrelink of certain proposed terminations);

(s) any other civil remedy provisions prescribed by the regulations.

(3) Subsection (1) does not apply to a contravention of a civil remedy provision that is committed by a person after a court has imposed a pecuniary penalty on the person for an earlier contravention of the provision.

Paragraphs 65 and 66 of Judge Jones’s decision state:

Section 557(1) of the Act provides that:
  • Course of conduct
  • (1) For the purposes of this Part, 2 or more contraventions of a civil remedy provision referred to in subsection (2) are, subject to subsection (3), taken to constitute a single contravention if:
    • (a) the contraventions are committed by the same person; and
    • (b) the contraventions arose out of a course of conduct by the person.

These provisions do not, however, apply to contraventions of the general protection provisions of the Act: sub-s.557(2) of the Act.

Why does the Judge state this? Section 340 is a civil remedy provision:


FAIR WORK ACT 2009 (NO. 28, 2009) - SECT 340​

Protection
(1) A person must not take adverse action against another person:

(a) because the other person:

(i) has a workplace right; or

(ii) has, or has not, exercised a workplace right; or

(iii) proposes or proposes not to, or has at any time proposed or proposed not to, exercise a workplace right; or

(b) to prevent the exercise of a workplace right by the other person.

Note: This subsection is a civil remedy provision (see Part 4‑1).

(2) A person must not take adverse action against another person (the second person ) because a third person has exercised, or proposes or has at any time proposed to exercise, a workplace right for the second person's benefit, or for the benefit of a class of persons to which the second person belongs.

Note: This subsection is a civil remedy provision (see Part 4‑1).
 

Taco Cat

Well-Known Member
30 April 2018
55
1
199
So you mean the reference to “regulations” in (s) is not meant to refer to the FW Act?

That at least makes sense.
 

CSFLW

Well-Known Member
LawConnect (LawTap) Verified
24 September 2018
460
29
659
Hello Taco Cat

Firstly, have you filed proceedings as the applicant, or are you the respondent (employer)?

Secondly, I think what you are asking is what is a course of conduct and how they relates to civil penalties ($$)?

Thirdly, in course of conduct assessments it depends on a how many breaches of the FW Act (which sections) are claimed (how many are you claiming?).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Taco Cat

Taco Cat

Well-Known Member
30 April 2018
55
1
199
Thanks, the Judge’s decision sense now, reading the regulations.

It’s surprising general protections are treated differently, but I guess it made sense to someone.