I was given a $400 fine for passsing my mobile phone to my wife in the passenger seat. In the 3 seconds this took me, a cop on a motorbike just happend to drive past and catch it on helmet-cam. Great timing, I know.
I was stoppped in traffic in a turning lane about 50m from the red traffic light with my gear selector in 'park', my handbrake engaged and the engine running.
Regulation 138(f) of the Road Traffic Code says it's a defence to the prosecution of a driver if the driver stops...to comply with another provision of the regulations.
Could it be argued that by putting my gear selector in 'park' and applying my handbrake that I had stopped the car in order to comply with regulation 265 (use of mobile phones), or are "stopped" and "parked" two very different things? Any chance I could argue my way to a parking offence instead of a mobile phone offence?
I was stoppped in traffic in a turning lane about 50m from the red traffic light with my gear selector in 'park', my handbrake engaged and the engine running.
Regulation 138(f) of the Road Traffic Code says it's a defence to the prosecution of a driver if the driver stops...to comply with another provision of the regulations.
Could it be argued that by putting my gear selector in 'park' and applying my handbrake that I had stopped the car in order to comply with regulation 265 (use of mobile phones), or are "stopped" and "parked" two very different things? Any chance I could argue my way to a parking offence instead of a mobile phone offence?