My brother got a divorce recently. He solely owns his house. He was married at the time of the purchase of the house but the girl was still in India as her spouse visa was not yetSgranted. The girl has not contributed at all toward the house or the family.
My brother took care of her. She chose not to work. She walked out of the house claiming falsely of domestic violence. She could not prove or present a thing which she claimed to have for the violence. My brother has basic intervention order as a result of the domestic violence case.
She also claimed that they owned jewelry worth AU$ 10000 which is not true. How would the property settlement be treated if she has not contributed at all toward family?
My brother took care of her. She chose not to work. She walked out of the house claiming falsely of domestic violence. She could not prove or present a thing which she claimed to have for the violence. My brother has basic intervention order as a result of the domestic violence case.
She also claimed that they owned jewelry worth AU$ 10000 which is not true. How would the property settlement be treated if she has not contributed at all toward family?