Hi,
Just got something that feels off and need some clarification if possible.
I had an issue I tried discussing with an ex awhile ago. I started a new job and time arrangements interfere with that and seeked a change in care.
They demanded proof of employment and personal information proving employment times. I didn't want to give them that, but in writing told them about employment.
Fast forward 4 months when my application in a proceeding comes forth... the judge questioned me as to why I didn't just give over personal correspondence from my employer to the mother?
and then imply I should just be giving out personal information and personal correspondence because they ask.
A personal letter and offer of employment is private information, that I don't see anywhere under law I'm required to give that out. and as such feels strange that I'm attacked for not giving that out.
Then the mothers solicitor and ICL went on that its unreasonable that I don't give them that personal information.
so my query is... this is personal correspondence to me and I'm under no obligation under law to just give that out... so what right does the court, mother and icl have to attack myself saying I should give this out?
My personal information and property is mine and feels strange to be attacked because I want to keep my personal information and property to myself and use how I see fit?
This whole point is weird and like a nothing point in the overall argument, but carried unrealistic weight because the judge asked it and I feel like I was attacked over my rights to private and confidential information
thats also my property.
thanks
Just got something that feels off and need some clarification if possible.
I had an issue I tried discussing with an ex awhile ago. I started a new job and time arrangements interfere with that and seeked a change in care.
They demanded proof of employment and personal information proving employment times. I didn't want to give them that, but in writing told them about employment.
Fast forward 4 months when my application in a proceeding comes forth... the judge questioned me as to why I didn't just give over personal correspondence from my employer to the mother?
and then imply I should just be giving out personal information and personal correspondence because they ask.
A personal letter and offer of employment is private information, that I don't see anywhere under law I'm required to give that out. and as such feels strange that I'm attacked for not giving that out.
Then the mothers solicitor and ICL went on that its unreasonable that I don't give them that personal information.
so my query is... this is personal correspondence to me and I'm under no obligation under law to just give that out... so what right does the court, mother and icl have to attack myself saying I should give this out?
My personal information and property is mine and feels strange to be attacked because I want to keep my personal information and property to myself and use how I see fit?
This whole point is weird and like a nothing point in the overall argument, but carried unrealistic weight because the judge asked it and I feel like I was attacked over my rights to private and confidential information
thats also my property.
thanks