Hi,
I have had a browse but can't seem to find the answers . Looking for some generalised guidance to come to a fair property settlement that doesn't involve a court due to small net asset pool.
Facts being:
Me 26 and her 23. I had net assets including home and mortgage of around 40k when I met my partner. For the next year and a half, she didn't really work or have an income (7k) and I fully supported her at my house.
After that we fell pregnant and have since had two kids. Net assets roughly 75k now and I put her name on the title and refinanced the home 1 year ago.
She hasn't worked since she first fell pregnant and has since been at home watching the children (just as valued as working). We are looking at separating assets and she wants half of the equity in the home (total being maybe 50k) and that's it.
What I want to know is does the fact I was the only one with any assets when we met and I supported her for almost 2 years before we had kids affect this.
I have done the calculation of all net assets including super, etc, etc, from the day I met her till now and offered her half of the increase in that. Is that fair or will the courts take into consideration the entire balance and disregard my asset pool prior to meeting her.
Also if there is a rough gauge of split in her favour on either calculation due to her lower earning potential, etc?
Many thanks in advance for any info or links!
I have had a browse but can't seem to find the answers . Looking for some generalised guidance to come to a fair property settlement that doesn't involve a court due to small net asset pool.
Facts being:
Me 26 and her 23. I had net assets including home and mortgage of around 40k when I met my partner. For the next year and a half, she didn't really work or have an income (7k) and I fully supported her at my house.
After that we fell pregnant and have since had two kids. Net assets roughly 75k now and I put her name on the title and refinanced the home 1 year ago.
She hasn't worked since she first fell pregnant and has since been at home watching the children (just as valued as working). We are looking at separating assets and she wants half of the equity in the home (total being maybe 50k) and that's it.
What I want to know is does the fact I was the only one with any assets when we met and I supported her for almost 2 years before we had kids affect this.
I have done the calculation of all net assets including super, etc, etc, from the day I met her till now and offered her half of the increase in that. Is that fair or will the courts take into consideration the entire balance and disregard my asset pool prior to meeting her.
Also if there is a rough gauge of split in her favour on either calculation due to her lower earning potential, etc?
Many thanks in advance for any info or links!