Hey guys,
I'm looking for some supporting case law or acts that can help out this particular case in favour of the father. Details are:
The father had 50:50 shared custody until 11year old daughter had a moody week and wanted to stay with the mum for a while. Father cooperated to give the daughter some space but the agreement became every other weekend in conjunction with the childs therapy session as she was showing signs of depression and father was concerned without 50:50 care she would suffer. Therapist and child have said that the child wants to go back to 50:50 care but the mother denies this to be true and shuts down conversations when the daughter asks for it
in conjunction to this, she has also asked for child support reassessment since now she has 100% care. the initial date was for June since that was when the mother claimed the child had decided this 100% custody with mum had been decided. then in September changed the details of the assessment to December the previous year which was when the daughter decided she needed "space" from dad temporarily
what i'm looking for is grounds that the mum is withholding the child in order to increase her payments (which have tripled since 50:50 custody) because it is financially beneficial OR grounds that re-assessment backdating to December goes against the agreement the father and mother made since he willingly allowed reassessment in JUNE due to being told the daughter didn't want to see him and that that was in fact untrue, if he had know the daughter did still want to be with him then the mother would not have had grounds for reassessment at all at either June or September.
I'm looking for some supporting case law or acts that can help out this particular case in favour of the father. Details are:
The father had 50:50 shared custody until 11year old daughter had a moody week and wanted to stay with the mum for a while. Father cooperated to give the daughter some space but the agreement became every other weekend in conjunction with the childs therapy session as she was showing signs of depression and father was concerned without 50:50 care she would suffer. Therapist and child have said that the child wants to go back to 50:50 care but the mother denies this to be true and shuts down conversations when the daughter asks for it
in conjunction to this, she has also asked for child support reassessment since now she has 100% care. the initial date was for June since that was when the mother claimed the child had decided this 100% custody with mum had been decided. then in September changed the details of the assessment to December the previous year which was when the daughter decided she needed "space" from dad temporarily
what i'm looking for is grounds that the mum is withholding the child in order to increase her payments (which have tripled since 50:50 custody) because it is financially beneficial OR grounds that re-assessment backdating to December goes against the agreement the father and mother made since he willingly allowed reassessment in JUNE due to being told the daughter didn't want to see him and that that was in fact untrue, if he had know the daughter did still want to be with him then the mother would not have had grounds for reassessment at all at either June or September.