My high-end mountain bike was stolen last November and I received an insurance replacement bike just before Christmas. In late January, my stolen bike was recovered and, under the instruction of the insurance company, I took possession of the bike. I was told to inspect the bike and decide whether I wanted to keep it (at a purchase price to be determined), or surrender to the insurance company for salvage.
The bike is in poor condition and not currently ridable but has some value to me for spare parts. I sent a message to the insurance company stating I was interested in keeping it for parts, pending price. They have not responded to my message for 12 working days; all previous email responses were 3 to 5 working days.
I'm a little annoyed as I'm currently storing their property for free, I only want to keep a few parts and would sell or dispose of the rest. Based on their lack of response, at what point can I assume the insurance company has surrendered ownership to me under Insurance Law?
It's a bit rude that I had to collect the bike on their behalf (very inconvenient), store it for them for an undetermined period of time, then have to chase them for a response on what they want me to do with it.
The bike is in poor condition and not currently ridable but has some value to me for spare parts. I sent a message to the insurance company stating I was interested in keeping it for parts, pending price. They have not responded to my message for 12 working days; all previous email responses were 3 to 5 working days.
I'm a little annoyed as I'm currently storing their property for free, I only want to keep a few parts and would sell or dispose of the rest. Based on their lack of response, at what point can I assume the insurance company has surrendered ownership to me under Insurance Law?
It's a bit rude that I had to collect the bike on their behalf (very inconvenient), store it for them for an undetermined period of time, then have to chase them for a response on what they want me to do with it.