I entered into a service agreement with a local computer repair shop to repair my computer six months ago.
They told me they ordered four parts but all of them have been faulty. I don't know if this is true or they're making excuses.
I went to look up the situation on the ACCC web site and it seems to suggest I'm entitled to either a free repair or a repair at anther repair shop and pass the cost on to them.
Today I asked the shop to either give me a free repair or agreet to pay tor the repair at a larger repair shop.
The shop refusedd either remedy. They told me that they've spent quite a lot of money on shipping parts back and forth and the agreement is already a large loss for them. They gave me three days to pick up my computer and take a refund of the money I paid at the start of the service agreement.
They explained the remedies only apply if you buy a defective product (like a new computer) with a repariable defect and that repair takes too long. They said it doesn't cover regular repair services like their shop. They also said there hasn't been a fault in their service because they're not to blame if their supplier sends faulty parts. According to the repair shop my service only becomes faulty if they get a good part and they can't install it.
Is that correct or am I entitled to ask for a remedy of my choice because of the time involved/repeated failures to fix my computer?
Here's what I was looking at on the ACCC page:
"Repairs"
If the problem with a product or service is minor, you must accept a free repair if the business offers you one.
If the business fails to give you a free repair within a reasonable time or cannot fix your problem, you can:
* get it done elsewhere and pass on the costs to the business
* ask for a replacement
* ask for a refund
* recover compensation for the drop in value below the price paid.
The repair shop says this part of the ACL doesn't apply to their repair service.
They told me they ordered four parts but all of them have been faulty. I don't know if this is true or they're making excuses.
I went to look up the situation on the ACCC web site and it seems to suggest I'm entitled to either a free repair or a repair at anther repair shop and pass the cost on to them.
Today I asked the shop to either give me a free repair or agreet to pay tor the repair at a larger repair shop.
The shop refusedd either remedy. They told me that they've spent quite a lot of money on shipping parts back and forth and the agreement is already a large loss for them. They gave me three days to pick up my computer and take a refund of the money I paid at the start of the service agreement.
They explained the remedies only apply if you buy a defective product (like a new computer) with a repariable defect and that repair takes too long. They said it doesn't cover regular repair services like their shop. They also said there hasn't been a fault in their service because they're not to blame if their supplier sends faulty parts. According to the repair shop my service only becomes faulty if they get a good part and they can't install it.
Is that correct or am I entitled to ask for a remedy of my choice because of the time involved/repeated failures to fix my computer?
Here's what I was looking at on the ACCC page:
"Repairs"
If the problem with a product or service is minor, you must accept a free repair if the business offers you one.
If the business fails to give you a free repair within a reasonable time or cannot fix your problem, you can:
* get it done elsewhere and pass on the costs to the business
* ask for a replacement
* ask for a refund
* recover compensation for the drop in value below the price paid.
The repair shop says this part of the ACL doesn't apply to their repair service.