Hello,
I have been falsely accused of child abuse and domestic violence.
I have not seen my children in more than 2 months. I have been offered only supervised access to the children at about that time. There is an interim AVO which I am fighting. It was a once off incident which occurred post separation and was so minor but now the police have given me another set of statements from her and her mother (also there) which exaggerates the AVO incident further.
Yesterday I had the first mention and the parties couldn't agree because I don't believe I need supervised access. My wife's barrister only had to mention the AVO in the first sentence to the judge and he ordered immediately that I receive only supervised access. The judge ordered children's lawyer, children's psychologist report (something like this I don't have the orders right now). My wife was so well represented.
Regarding the AVO there are now 3 different and inconsistent accounts of the incident; the first when the incident occurred, another statement to the police which adds assault (something I was not questioned on) and was allegedly noted on the day and also a third recollection which is different again and is contained in her family law affidavit.
I have produced a family law affidavit where I deny all her allegations of child abuse and family violence. She has not produced any evidence such as police reports (other than the current AVO) or DOCS or any other such evidence. Question, does she need to? We were married 12 years and there was never any report of violence or child abuse.
My family lawyers advice has been to submit nothing in the way of subpoenas and says that we just have to sit back and make them have to prove the allegations; that it's her word against mine and that she has no evidence other than her affidavit. My wife's lawyers have thus far not produced any subpoenas.
The interim hearing is coming up soon in October.
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
I have been falsely accused of child abuse and domestic violence.
I have not seen my children in more than 2 months. I have been offered only supervised access to the children at about that time. There is an interim AVO which I am fighting. It was a once off incident which occurred post separation and was so minor but now the police have given me another set of statements from her and her mother (also there) which exaggerates the AVO incident further.
Yesterday I had the first mention and the parties couldn't agree because I don't believe I need supervised access. My wife's barrister only had to mention the AVO in the first sentence to the judge and he ordered immediately that I receive only supervised access. The judge ordered children's lawyer, children's psychologist report (something like this I don't have the orders right now). My wife was so well represented.
Regarding the AVO there are now 3 different and inconsistent accounts of the incident; the first when the incident occurred, another statement to the police which adds assault (something I was not questioned on) and was allegedly noted on the day and also a third recollection which is different again and is contained in her family law affidavit.
I have produced a family law affidavit where I deny all her allegations of child abuse and family violence. She has not produced any evidence such as police reports (other than the current AVO) or DOCS or any other such evidence. Question, does she need to? We were married 12 years and there was never any report of violence or child abuse.
My family lawyers advice has been to submit nothing in the way of subpoenas and says that we just have to sit back and make them have to prove the allegations; that it's her word against mine and that she has no evidence other than her affidavit. My wife's lawyers have thus far not produced any subpoenas.
The interim hearing is coming up soon in October.
Any advice is greatly appreciated.