Hi,
My ex and I went to mediation, where we 'agreed' on a set of new orders that needed to be finalised.
Upon receiving the draft orders, I noticed that she is not allowing me to have my daughter for the last 11 consecutive days of the Autumn, Winter and Spring school holidays every year, rather than every second year.
Now this wouldn't be a problem if we lived in the same state and I didn't have any children in NSW. But we do and I have another child (possibly more in the future).
The reason I want the last 11 consecutive days is because I would like both my children to be able to bond and build a relationship and I'm afraid that by the time my youngest starts school. My eldest will be 11/12 and will not want to build a relationship if she only spends literally 23 full days with her other siblings each year.
I mentioned this during mediation and the ex stated "well it would be nice for you to have 1 on 1 time with her. And that doesn't work for me because M (her child) goes to her father's house for the holidays so S (our child) will not get to spend holidays with her".
My daughter and M live together.
I have drafted the orders and added my proposed changes and wrote to the solicitor with what changes I would like and the reasons why but the above is the main one...
If the ex denies my proposition... What do I do? We have a family court date listed in December for her contraventions (she was previously self-representing as Legal Aid turned her down and now she has miraculously found money to afford a lawyer). We won't be going back to court if this is settled.
Do you think the above is unreasonable to ask? Considering my other children will only get to spend 36 days max with my daughter (per year) - I don't really find it fair that my ex is taking 10+ days off them.
This is not about me or her... It's literally about the children!!
The whole point of taking her to court is that she is unwilling to facilitate a relationship with my daughter and myself (let alone my other children) and broke existing court orders to hinder what relationship we do have.
My ex and I went to mediation, where we 'agreed' on a set of new orders that needed to be finalised.
Upon receiving the draft orders, I noticed that she is not allowing me to have my daughter for the last 11 consecutive days of the Autumn, Winter and Spring school holidays every year, rather than every second year.
Now this wouldn't be a problem if we lived in the same state and I didn't have any children in NSW. But we do and I have another child (possibly more in the future).
The reason I want the last 11 consecutive days is because I would like both my children to be able to bond and build a relationship and I'm afraid that by the time my youngest starts school. My eldest will be 11/12 and will not want to build a relationship if she only spends literally 23 full days with her other siblings each year.
I mentioned this during mediation and the ex stated "well it would be nice for you to have 1 on 1 time with her. And that doesn't work for me because M (her child) goes to her father's house for the holidays so S (our child) will not get to spend holidays with her".
My daughter and M live together.
I have drafted the orders and added my proposed changes and wrote to the solicitor with what changes I would like and the reasons why but the above is the main one...
If the ex denies my proposition... What do I do? We have a family court date listed in December for her contraventions (she was previously self-representing as Legal Aid turned her down and now she has miraculously found money to afford a lawyer). We won't be going back to court if this is settled.
Do you think the above is unreasonable to ask? Considering my other children will only get to spend 36 days max with my daughter (per year) - I don't really find it fair that my ex is taking 10+ days off them.
This is not about me or her... It's literally about the children!!
The whole point of taking her to court is that she is unwilling to facilitate a relationship with my daughter and myself (let alone my other children) and broke existing court orders to hinder what relationship we do have.