Hi there,
My car broke down and had to be towed to the dealer where I normally service the car. It was purchased in August 2012, so within the 3 year warranty period. The NRMA technician diagnosed the problem as an issue with the alternator not charging (ie not a flat battery).
When I towed the car there, I was told that they had a queue of cars waiting to be serviced, but that they would see if they could fit mine in (no promises though). I stressed that the car had totally broken down and that I had no alternative car and being under warranty, it was reasonable to expect for some urgency on their part. The dealer did not make a loan car available and I was told to call the manufacturer to obtain a loan car from them - suffice to say, there was a vicious circle where the manufacturer would not provide a loan car until the dealer provided a diagnosis.
23 days later, I have a bill for $1025 for car hire. I think it is fair that these costs incurred as a result of the car being unavailable should be reimbursed under the warranty - where do I stand legally on this?
Thanks in advance.
JD
My car broke down and had to be towed to the dealer where I normally service the car. It was purchased in August 2012, so within the 3 year warranty period. The NRMA technician diagnosed the problem as an issue with the alternator not charging (ie not a flat battery).
When I towed the car there, I was told that they had a queue of cars waiting to be serviced, but that they would see if they could fit mine in (no promises though). I stressed that the car had totally broken down and that I had no alternative car and being under warranty, it was reasonable to expect for some urgency on their part. The dealer did not make a loan car available and I was told to call the manufacturer to obtain a loan car from them - suffice to say, there was a vicious circle where the manufacturer would not provide a loan car until the dealer provided a diagnosis.
23 days later, I have a bill for $1025 for car hire. I think it is fair that these costs incurred as a result of the car being unavailable should be reimbursed under the warranty - where do I stand legally on this?
Thanks in advance.
JD