VIC Challenging Multiple “driving unregistered vehicle” fines

Australia's #1 for Law
Join 150,000 Australians every month. Ask a question, respond to a question and better understand the law today!
FREE - Join Now

adonis_paradise

Well-Known Member
26 April 2021
20
0
121
Hi all.

Ok, so I got two infringement notices, one for speeding (allegedly 70 a 60 zone), and a few weeks later, one for entering an intersection allegedly 0.8 seconds after the right hand arrow turned red (this one I remember, it was a traffic clogged, rush hour, 'traffic at a stop' situation, and I was focussed on the cars, cyclists, pedestrians etc etc). Anyway, these were both accompanied with “using an unregistered vehicle” fines, which I'll refer to as "Fine1", and "Fine2".

I read on the website (Official warnings), under the ‘multiple fines’ section:
These guidelines are being adopted to ensure that drivers are being afforded the opportunity to positively alter their driver behaviour, without being penalised by multiple infringements

In my case, I only became aware that my vehicle was not registered after receiving Fine1. At the time I committed the second offense (Fine2) I was still unaware that my registration had lapsed, thus I did not have the opportunity to rectify the situation.

I paid Fine1, and made a ‘request for a review’ for Fine2 to Fines Victoria (mentioning the above "guidelines"), and asked them to please accept my apology, and request that they please withdraw Fine2 please, but they declined:

“I am satisfied that the alleged offence was committed, and confirm that the issue of the Infringement Notice was justified. Your circumstances have been considered, and in this instance, this offence is considered to be a serious safety related matter. As a result, the issue of an Official Warning Notice would not be appropriate”

I understand this is a cut/paste generic response. They didn't address the guidelines, so I have no indication that they even read/considered what I wrote.

I am tempted to take the matter to court, but I hesitate, because a few months later *sigh* … I made the stupid decision to drive the (unregistered) car again and got another “using an unregistered vehicle” fine. Yes, I know, I know. Anyway, I immediately paid Fine3, and I seek opinions on where I stand now with contesting Fine2 in Court:

School of thought 1:
Forget it. Receiving Fine3 eliminated any image of me as a “fine, upstanding citizen”, and negated my clear driving record for many decades, and always paying my reg (using the stickers system) on time. The Magistrate will question my character, and he will not care that I was a sleep deprived, new dad, mid Covidmania, who had made a series of honest, genuine mistakes.

School of thought 2:
The third offense doesn’t negate the fact that Fine2 was indeed incurred before I was aware there was an issue. Therefore inspite of my now "tainted character", I do have a legal case for disputing Fine2.

Opinions much appreciated.

AP.
ps People tell me "it depends on the Magistrate you get on the day", which is very disconcerting, and seems an indightment on the legal system.
 

Rod

Lawyer
LawConnect (LawTap) Verified
27 May 2014
7,817
1,072
2,894
www.hutchinsonlegal.com.au
Thought 1.

Arguing you were sleep deprived is the same as admitting how irresponsible you were to get behind the wheel of car.

PS: LAW has reached its finest moments when it has freed men from the unlimited discretion of some ruler, some civil or military official, some bureaucrat. Where discretion is absolute, man has always suffered.” — Justice William Douglas of the US Supreme Court

Versus the sometimes unjust result obtained by rigid adherence to black letter law.

These competing principles of Black letter law versus Judicial discretion must remain, and must remain in tension. Either one failing is going to result in a far worse outcome for society as a whole,
 

adonis_paradise

Well-Known Member
26 April 2021
20
0
121
Hi Rod.

Thanks for the response.

Arguing you were sleep deprived is the same as admitting how irresponsible you were to get behind the wheel of car.

Yes, I wasn't suggesting 'sleep deprivation' as a valid defense for the driving offenses. I only mentioned this in the context of a Magistrate assessing my character, and speculating as to whether I'm a good guy who deserves a break, or a bad guy who 'need to be taught a lesson'.

So... what do you think -

Q: Do I still have a chance successfully disputing Fine2 (ie in light of Fine3)?

thanks,

AP
ps I'm googling "black letter law"..