In October 2014, I was involved in a car accident resulting in damage to both cars.
As I was unlicensed at the time, the car accident was judged to be my fault and the other person's car insurance company sent a letter of demand for payment of $9,800 for repairs carried out on her car.
The letter of demand requested payment in full unless they had correspondence from me stating the need to enter into a payment plan. This letter was received in late November 2014 and gave 14 days payment due on 1 December 2014, I called to advise that I could not afford this amount and they said they would send out a proposal to enter into a payment plan.
I never received this paperwork and called to advise. They said they would send again.
In the meantime two friends had remarked that they felt that the cost of almost $10,000 for repairs to a vehicle that suffered damage to only the right side of the car and NO structural or mechanical damage seemed excessive.
When the paperwork arrived on 18 December 2014, I called to advise my case manager that I had finally received the payment proposal paperwork and that I had concerns about the charges. She arranged for me to speak to the insurance assessor. He said he didn't agree but that if i wanted to make enquiries I was welcome to do so.
Everything now placed on hold.
On 30 December 2014, I spoke to my case manager to advise her that I was waiting for companies to get back to me and that due to the Christmas break it had proven difficult to get all the information required and that i required a week or more to obtain this info. We agreed a date and I continued to gather information. When, for various reasons i began to get feedback from smash repairs they now required photographic evidence.
On 9 January 2015, I called and advised that the quotes would take longer and also advised required photographs and drew her attention to an overcharge in there towing fees (i was being charged for more of the towing than i should be. 4 lots instead of 3, though i dispute that it should even be 3) my case manager informed me that new paperwork would have to be drawn up and sent out.
I forgot to remind her to send photographs and called again. left message. I heard nothing and called again and was informed that my case was no longer with the person i was dealing with and that the matter was now with their legals team and that they had done this to get permission to send photographs. I have since suspected that my case manager was relieved of this case and it was taken by a team member in another dept with the sole purpose of pushing this along) i had still received no photographs and on 15 January 2015, I called and another team member advised that they had been sent on the 13th and i told her nothing in my mail so she resent. these came through on the 16 january. So i started the ball rolling again and re-submitted each quote request with the insurance companies itemised invoice, listing parts numbers, costings etc, and the 17 photos of the car.
By 21 January 2015, i was able to show a cost of between $5000-$7000 for the damage to be repaired. This was backed up by two further verbal quotes and so i submitted my findings to the insurer.
On 22 January 2015, I was advised by the car insurance company that a quote in writing was required not a figure from me so i re-sent on January 2015 and the car insurers case manager responded on the 29 January 2015 and advised the following:
I responded with this:
the insurer informed on 30th January 2014
I am about to respond and outline a few things including their working with me by suspending the investigation providing info such as photographs yet all the time they would reject based on the vehicle not being physically inspected. Why? Why string me along? also advising that the quote is fine as it is based on their own itemised account and photos and this is more than enough for a professional to provide a quote.
To be honest, I am a wreck. The car insurance company knows about my stress, depression, anxiety issues etc and is now appearing to stonewall me and bully me. Threatening me with car accident lawyers and demands for money.
What are my rights? Am i being intimidated cause it sure feels like it?
As I was unlicensed at the time, the car accident was judged to be my fault and the other person's car insurance company sent a letter of demand for payment of $9,800 for repairs carried out on her car.
The letter of demand requested payment in full unless they had correspondence from me stating the need to enter into a payment plan. This letter was received in late November 2014 and gave 14 days payment due on 1 December 2014, I called to advise that I could not afford this amount and they said they would send out a proposal to enter into a payment plan.
I never received this paperwork and called to advise. They said they would send again.
In the meantime two friends had remarked that they felt that the cost of almost $10,000 for repairs to a vehicle that suffered damage to only the right side of the car and NO structural or mechanical damage seemed excessive.
When the paperwork arrived on 18 December 2014, I called to advise my case manager that I had finally received the payment proposal paperwork and that I had concerns about the charges. She arranged for me to speak to the insurance assessor. He said he didn't agree but that if i wanted to make enquiries I was welcome to do so.
Everything now placed on hold.
On 30 December 2014, I spoke to my case manager to advise her that I was waiting for companies to get back to me and that due to the Christmas break it had proven difficult to get all the information required and that i required a week or more to obtain this info. We agreed a date and I continued to gather information. When, for various reasons i began to get feedback from smash repairs they now required photographic evidence.
On 9 January 2015, I called and advised that the quotes would take longer and also advised required photographs and drew her attention to an overcharge in there towing fees (i was being charged for more of the towing than i should be. 4 lots instead of 3, though i dispute that it should even be 3) my case manager informed me that new paperwork would have to be drawn up and sent out.
I forgot to remind her to send photographs and called again. left message. I heard nothing and called again and was informed that my case was no longer with the person i was dealing with and that the matter was now with their legals team and that they had done this to get permission to send photographs. I have since suspected that my case manager was relieved of this case and it was taken by a team member in another dept with the sole purpose of pushing this along) i had still received no photographs and on 15 January 2015, I called and another team member advised that they had been sent on the 13th and i told her nothing in my mail so she resent. these came through on the 16 january. So i started the ball rolling again and re-submitted each quote request with the insurance companies itemised invoice, listing parts numbers, costings etc, and the 17 photos of the car.
By 21 January 2015, i was able to show a cost of between $5000-$7000 for the damage to be repaired. This was backed up by two further verbal quotes and so i submitted my findings to the insurer.
On 22 January 2015, I was advised by the car insurance company that a quote in writing was required not a figure from me so i re-sent on January 2015 and the car insurers case manager responded on the 29 January 2015 and advised the following:
The below email does not have any quotes attached – we will require written quotes an estimate is not enough to review.
I responded with this:
As **** is aware, in order to give an accurate quote the vehicle would need to be examined physically and in its damaged state, to work out an exact quote.
Unfortunately your company chose to go ahead and complete all repairs without any consultation and i would like to point out that until the day **** letter of demand arrived the correspondence had been non-existent.
The closest and only way that a quote/estimate can be given is one based on the itemised parts list and the photos the biggest hurdle to giving an accurate quote is being able to work out the time it would take to beat out panels, but a professional could still provide a figure based on your photos and itemised list that includes an estimate that would be extremely close.
So with that in mind, i feel that the amount of 5000 to 7000 has been given with more than enough information to come back with a fair estimate of the costs involved and this indicates that it would not be as high as the figures given by **** repairer and it does bring into question whether or not the final amount being requested is excessive.
There is no damage to the frame, chassis or engine and apart from the right rear wheel, the only work required was for the panels, painting and a few cosmetics.
So far the feedback provided by various companies has given enough cause for reasonable doubt regarding the total amount charged by ****.
You can state that without examining the car physically the companies cannot provide a correct and accurate quote, but they can come extremely close with what information is at hand and the figure falls well short of the almost $10,000 demanded by ****.
I would like to state right here and in writing that this is NOT a refusal to pay for the damages to your clients vehicle. I am more than happy to pay for these damages but I will pay for what is a fair and equitable amount and the “estimated” amount raises enough questions to warrant further investigation.
the insurer informed on 30th January 2014
In response to your email below.
As you have stated - in order to give an accurate quote the vehicle would need to be examined physically and in its damaged state, to work out an exact quote.
Our Assessor and our repairer Crawford Crash Repairs were able to examine our Insured’s vehicle in its’ damaged state and if required can attend Court to give their evidence in the matter.
I would now ask for payment of $9732.80 to be paid within 14 days of this email or we will have no option to commence legal Proceedings against you without any further notice.
I am about to respond and outline a few things including their working with me by suspending the investigation providing info such as photographs yet all the time they would reject based on the vehicle not being physically inspected. Why? Why string me along? also advising that the quote is fine as it is based on their own itemised account and photos and this is more than enough for a professional to provide a quote.
To be honest, I am a wreck. The car insurance company knows about my stress, depression, anxiety issues etc and is now appearing to stonewall me and bully me. Threatening me with car accident lawyers and demands for money.
What are my rights? Am i being intimidated cause it sure feels like it?