I have come to a disagreement with my landlord where I argue he is in breach in contract. My landlord disagrees. I have given my termination notice with the vacate day where I have paid rent until (which was a few days after sending the termination notice). My landlord is refusing to agree that there is a breach in contract, however I refuse to remain at the property. I have applied for my bond back. If he decides to take me to tribunal and I lose my bond, is the landlord allowed to make me pay more costs? for example loss of rent? I have clearly stated my vacate date in the termination notice and refuse to stay regardless, and will be providing my keys back on that termination date.
The reason for terminate lease is because there is black mould all under the carpets and a cockroach infestation. It was only once I served my termination notice that the landlord agreed to change the carpet, cover the costs of mould removal and do a professional pest control. Prior to that, the landlord was not wanting to negotiate or come to an agreement. It has taken over two weeks for him to agree to those fixes, and we no longer want anything to do with the landlord. in the agreement he states there is no mould or pest infestation, however clearly we have found.
Q. Will the landlord/tribunal force me to pay more than the bond (rent) if they believe he was not in breach in contract, even though I think he was due to the above mentioned?
The reason for terminate lease is because there is black mould all under the carpets and a cockroach infestation. It was only once I served my termination notice that the landlord agreed to change the carpet, cover the costs of mould removal and do a professional pest control. Prior to that, the landlord was not wanting to negotiate or come to an agreement. It has taken over two weeks for him to agree to those fixes, and we no longer want anything to do with the landlord. in the agreement he states there is no mould or pest infestation, however clearly we have found.
Q. Will the landlord/tribunal force me to pay more than the bond (rent) if they believe he was not in breach in contract, even though I think he was due to the above mentioned?