NSW Breach of Copyright for Adaptation of Existing Artwork Cover?

Australia's #1 for Law
Join 150,000 Australians every month. Ask a question, respond to a question and better understand the law today!
FREE - Join Now

Maxie

Member
5 December 2014
2
0
1
Hi all,

Our team is trying to create a tvc for pest control.

One of our ideas is to have one shot of one of the actors showing them reading a book.

The book cover will be an adaptation of an existing DVD artWorkCover.

What we've done is basically change the colour, add a few extra details so the final look is, although different, still quite similar to this existing work so people get the reference.

Can anyone tell me if this will be breaching any copyright and intellectual property law?

Your help would be much appreciated.
 

Tim W

Lawyer
LawConnect (LawTap) Verified
28 April 2014
5,039
830
2,894
Sydney
Unless you have the OK from the copyright holder of the DVD cover,
for which you may have to pay, and which they can refuse,
then you may well have a problem, yes.
 

Maxie

Member
5 December 2014
2
0
1
Hi Tim,

What we're basically doing is very similar to what Aldi is doing with having products similar to already existing products.

So, different size, shape, colour, copy and it's a book not a DVD. It just looks similar to the original.

It's only for a prop that might not be that noticeable.

Do you think we'd still get in trouble for this?
 

Tim W

Lawyer
LawConnect (LawTap) Verified
28 April 2014
5,039
830
2,894
Sydney
What we're basically doing is very similar to what Aldi is doing with having products similar to already existing products.
Aldi has had high level legal advice about their packaging art and their products' trademarks.

So, different size, shape, colour, copy and it's a book not a DVD. It just looks similar to the original.
Doesn't much matter what it's on.
The test is one of deceptive similarity (and no, "...but it's art" is not an excuse).
As a general thing, if a reasonable punter sees the thing on-screen
and says to herself something like
"That looks like the the cover art of 'Dark Side Of The Moon'"*
then you may have a problem.

It's only for a prop that might not be that noticeable.
Then why not avoid the problem and use original art?

Do you think we'd still get in trouble for this?
Hard to say without seeing the art.
Owners of media and artistic IP can be vigourous and energetic in its defence.
Suffice to say that if you feel the need to seek advice about it, then maybe avoid that art.


-----------------------
* Yes, I accept that, to some people, that album is as ancient as Beethoven.
But the cover art is familiar enough to most people that it makes a good example here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sarah J