Hi guys,
So I made an application to the supreme court to have a caveat removed. It resulted in me having to pay costs to the other side. (I self-represented)
6 months later, in family court, I have proven the law firm was in a conflict of interest from the start. So the caveat they acquired on behalf of my ex was not valid, so the whole application I did was wrongly judged.
Is there a process to have the orders varied or the application re-heard now that I have proven the caveat at the time was defective and his honour's orders were not consistent with the law.
I am in Victoria by the way.
Thanks
So I made an application to the supreme court to have a caveat removed. It resulted in me having to pay costs to the other side. (I self-represented)
6 months later, in family court, I have proven the law firm was in a conflict of interest from the start. So the caveat they acquired on behalf of my ex was not valid, so the whole application I did was wrongly judged.
Is there a process to have the orders varied or the application re-heard now that I have proven the caveat at the time was defective and his honour's orders were not consistent with the law.
I am in Victoria by the way.
Thanks